Communication norms: which channel, what for, how fast

Communication norms: which channel, what for, how fast

> 🧩 A Moral Fabric pattern, free for any nonprofit to use and adapt.

The context

Without a written norm, response speed becomes a status game. Everything arrives by direct message, urgent and non-urgent look identical, decisions get made in chat threads nobody can find three weeks later, and new colleagues guess which channel to use — usually by copying whoever they sat next to first. The fix is one page, and it takes an hour to write.

The pattern

For every channel you use, write down two things: what it is for, and how fast a reply can be expected. A workable default set, with internal replies capped at three business days and external at seven days or an acknowledgement:
  • Task tracker (Asana, Linear, whatever you use) — anything that needs tracking, assigning or a due date. Three business days.
  • Chat (Slack, Teams) — quick clarifications and social. Same day for direct messages and mentions, no expectation on channel messages.
  • Wiki (Slite, Notion) — documentation and decisions that outlive the week. Comment for questions; three business days.
  • External email — anything with people outside the organization. Seven days, or an acknowledgement within seven if the answer takes longer.
  • A call or a walk — disagreement, feedback, anything with emotional weight. Not a channel of last resort; the right first choice more often than teams think.
Five rules make the difference between a norms page and a norms page that works:
  • If your chat message runs longer than three sentences, it belongs in the task tracker. Long chat messages are tasks in disguise, and they vanish.
  • Over-ask rather than under-ask. Don't decide on someone else's behalf that they're too busy to be asked.
  • Say when you need it. Say honestly when you can do it. A stated date beats an implied urgency.
  • Decisions get recorded where the work lives , not in the thread where they happened.
  • Expectations belong in role accountabilities , not in chat history. If it only exists in a thread, nobody is accountable for it.
Decision test: a colleague in their first week should be able to pick the right channel and know when to expect an answer, without asking anyone which is which.

What to do

    List your channels, including the ones you wish people didn't use.
    Write one purpose and one response time per channel. Promise what you can actually keep — a norm nobody meets is worse than none.
    Name the escalation route for genuinely urgent things, and define urgent. If everything qualifies, nothing does.
    Publish it on the wiki, link it from onboarding, and mention it once in each channel.
    Review after a month. Where reality and the page disagree, change the page.

What's mandatory regardless

Personal data about staff, beneficiaries or donors doesn't belong in chat. Keep it in systems with access control and a retention policy — chat history is searchable by everyone in the workspace, indefinitely, and under the GDPR you need to be able to find and delete personal data on request. That is hard to do in a decade of threads.

Your variation

Record your organization's choices:
  • Your channel list, with a purpose and response time each
  • What counts as urgent, and the escalation route
  • Whether there is any out-of-hours expectation, and for whom
  • Where decisions are recorded
  • Whether the norms are advice or a policy that changes only by proposal