This page helps small nonprofits choose an applicant tracking system (ATS). It compares five tools on the criteria that matter most for a lean team: price, who legally controls your candidate data, GDPR tooling, ease of setup, and candidate communication.
Comparison
The comparison assumes a team of 5 employees, a maximum of 5 concurrent open roles, an EU base (Netherlands), and a preference for the simplest setup that stays GDPR-sound.
Note: we're still testing some of these ATS, so our recommendations might change over time.
Title
Homerun
Join
Asana
Odoo
Recruitee
Recommended by Moral Fabric?
Probably (we're still testing):
bit more expensive than Join
but data ownership = in the EU
Probably (we're still testing):
cheaper than Homerun
but data ownership ≠ 100% in the EU
No
No
Good ATS, but most expensive and built for bigger orgs
*All prices exclude VAT. ⚠ = estimate or nonprofit discount applied; verify before budgeting.
Good to know
Odoo's free plan covers one app only. Adding any second module, including the Website module for a career page, moves all users to the paid Standard plan (currently €11.90/user/mo, verified June 2026 on odoo.com/pricing ).
Join prices per active job, not per seat. A role that closes in three weeks costs less than one that stays open for two months.
Recruitee pricing is not published. The figure in this comparison is a third-party estimate from January 2026. Request a quote directly before budgeting.
Fingerprint scans are from September 11, 2026. Vendor ownership structures change. Re-scan before a final decision at app.moralfabric.org/fingerprint.